Blog post by Dr. Benjamin L. Corey, author and speaker with a passion for dissecting the overlap between faith and culture, and exploring the mission of the Church. You can follow his blog on http://www.patheos.com/blogs/formerlyfundie/
I think I’ve probably heard this more times than I could ever count: “Pornography is what’s fuelling human trafficking.”
I’ve spoken on the topic of human trafficking at events, and heard other speakers make this claim. I’ve read countless opinion pieces that make this argument as well, and was shocked with how many there were when I googled the term.
It’s an argument that’s common and is literally everywhere.
The main problem? Well, it’s not actually true.
First, let me say, I’m not a fan of porn. But even though I have my own feelings and beliefs regarding porn, as a trafficking scholar I think it’s important that we deal in facts– not baseless or unprovable claims.
When we say things that are untrue, it affects our credibility and at times can actually harm trafficking victims themselves.
So let me quickly explain why this claim is untrue:
First, human trafficking is an issue of forced labour. It’s always an issue of forced labour, and must meet the definition of being conducted through “force, fraud, or coercion.” Without one of these criteria, a situation can never be considered human trafficking. A great way to summarise the three criteria is to ask: Are they choosing to do this work, or is someone making them? If someone isn’t making them do it, it’s not trafficking (even if they are exploited in some way– exploitation and trafficking are different words).
This forced labour may be blue collar in nature, such as forced labour harvesting shrimp in Thailand, or it may be forced sexual labour, which is where we get the term “sex trafficking.”
When folks say pornography is what’s causing or fuelling human trafficking, they really mean forced sexual labour in particular. Their argument is that people are being forced into sex work because of the cultural impact of pornography. (The assumption being that watching pornography is the chief cause behind people wanting to pay for sex, and that this eventually leads to the girl next door getting kidnapped and sold to traffickers– assumptions that would both be wrong.)
So here’s the problem: The era where pornography is available at your fingertips is relatively new. When I was a kid, if you wanted pornography you had to actually go to a store and buy a magazine. And while some forms of pornographic imagery existed prior to that magazine era (such as erotic depictions well into ancient history), it certainly was not porn in the form or prevalence we have today. Thus, we can say that the proliferation of pornography is a relatively modern issue that came in the internet era.
To be true, the facts would need to flow like this: If pornography is the causation behind sex trafficking, and if the wide-spread existence of pornography is relatively new in history, one would also find that the phenomenon of forced sexual labour is new as well.
Except, it’s not. (One would also expect to find a low incidence of trafficking in cultures with low access to porn, which isn’t true either.)
We have evidence of forced labour stemming back thousands of years (including some cave drawings dated at circa 4000 BCE). We also have times in history when combating forced sexual labour was on the radar of folks—including early American Evangelicals who dealt with the issue of trafficking long before pornography became prevalent.
There’s nothing about forced labour that’s new—and nothing about forced sexual labour that’s new, either.
Thus, it cannot be said that pornography is the causation behind human trafficking. Even if you eradicate porn, you do not eradicate human trafficking– as history and other cultures bear witness.
So if not porn, what is causing it? The causation of all human trafficking is the same: Greed. Trafficking is about forced labour. Forced labour is done at the hands of those who want a higher profit, and who realise that the quickest way to unlimited profit is to force people to work for you, and to not pay them for it.
In the realm of sex trafficking, we recognise that sex is a basic human need and that there will always be a demand for sex. In response to this demand, some have always participated in a system of either buying or selling sex. This system of trading sex has existed as far back in history as one wants to look, as the demand for sex is not fuelled by pornography, but our own God-given biology as human beings. (And this is why you cannot “end demand” as some activists claim– you cannot end the demand for sex any more than you can end demand for food or water.)
As with any system that involves the sale of labour and the exchange of money, there will always be some people who seek to collect a profit without doing the work themselves– and that’s what gives birth to trafficking in any form.
This exists in all systems, which is why we find trafficking everywhere– from the sale of sex, to the making of carpets, or the harvesting in diamonds or chocolate or… I could go on forever, because trafficking happens in every industry imaginable. It is not unique to the sex industry because it’s not really about sex—it’s about greed. (In fact, the vast majority of human trafficking world-wide is not actually the trafficking of sexual labour at all, but other labour trafficking to ensure we in the West can buy our day-to-day products at the cheapest price imaginable.)
None of this has a root cause in pornography. Rid the world of porn, and you’ll still have a world where there’s forced labour—including sexual labour, as sex will always be in demand and doesn’t need help from pornography. (You know what they say– a good product sells itself.)
In most other industries (see agriculture, fisheries, manufacturing, etc.) we address trafficking through regulation, oversight, and ensuring worker’s rights, but strangely enough when it comes to sex work we think that pushing it deeper into the dark corners of society (abolition, Nordic Model, et al.) will make trafficking end– when it actually makes it worse. (Which is why Amnesty International and others, such as myself, are calling for a full decriminalisation of sex work.)
In the world of trafficking, porn is just a low hanging fruit that becomes an easy scapegoat.
Even if one has their own moral or ethical objections to pornography, it’s still critically important to deal in facts when we try to address the causation of human trafficking.
And the fact is, pornography is not the cause behind human trafficking– greed is.